AI Initiative logoAI Initiative
Reading room / Quantum & memory

References

Consolidated citations supporting the AI–quantum symbiosis series.

Bibliography
This is the retained source text, not a new validation of its claims. Numerical results and comparative claims require the accompanying source review before public reuse.

Read the connected case study or article →

Author not established in the source · Date not established

Provenance, authorship and editorial notes

References

Id

quantum-symbiosis-references

Source path

Learning/ai_quantum_symbiosis/references.md

Source sha256

d9a16b4138f96108ebed0f3fb9002acbfd1c7353c6e349801a17025ad88fcccf

Bytes

11508

Repo root
Not recorded
Repo head
Not recorded
Last git commit date
Not recorded
Copy scope

Private full-text review candidate; not approved for public release.

Copy status

FULL_TEXT_BYTE_IDENTICAL

Metadata lines
  • ## Consolidated Academic Citations for the AI-Quantum Symbiosis Series
Author
Not recorded
Date
Not recorded
Format

Markdown

Publication status

NOT_ESTABLISHED

Word count

1519

Disclosure concerns
  • Authorised private review copy. Preserve the original attribution and document status when selecting a public edition.
  • Document claims and numerical results are historical source assertions, not independently revalidated by this discovery.
  • Verify each reference and that its cited claim matches the primary source before external release.
Author provenance

Not stated; not inferred from repository ownership

Date provenance

Not stated; citation access and Git commit dates are not publication dates

Document status

Bibliography

Summary

Consolidated citations supporting the AI–quantum symbiosis series.

Recommended library type

Series bibliography

Attribution scope

AI Initiative named on principal quantum paper; do not propagate its personal byline automatically to every companion document.

Private review scan
Id

quantum-symbiosis-references

Scanned file

AI-Initiative-Architecture-Review-2026-10-26/research/publications/quantum-symbiosis-references.md

Sha256

d9a16b4138f96108ebed0f3fb9002acbfd1c7353c6e349801a17025ad88fcccf

Credential pattern counts
Private key

0

Provider key

0

Github token

0

Aws access id

0

Jwt

0

Quoted credential assignment

0

Email count

0

Contact classification

No email patterns found

Customer record findings

No customer-record content identified in targeted text inspection.

Limits

Targeted pattern scan and publication-text review, not exhaustive data-loss-prevention certification.

References

Consolidated Academic Citations for the AI-Quantum Symbiosis Series


1. Foundational Quantum Computing

1. Nielsen, M. A., & Chuang, I. L. (2010). Quantum Computation and Quantum Information (10th Anniversary Edition). Cambridge University Press.

2. Preskill, J. (2018). "Quantum Computing in the NISQ era and beyond." Quantum, 2, 79. https://doi.org/10.22331/q-2018-08-06-79

3. Arute, F., et al. (2019). "Quantum supremacy using a programmable superconducting processor." Nature, 574(7779), 505-510. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1666-5

4. Zhong, H. S., et al. (2020). "Quantum computational advantage using photons." Science, 370(6523), 1460-1463. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abe8770

5. Acharya, R., et al. (2024). "Quantum error correction below the surface code threshold." Nature, 634, 315-320. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-024-08449-y


2. Quantum Error Correction

6. Gottesman, D. (2010). "An introduction to quantum error correction and fault-tolerant quantum computation." Quantum Information Science and Its Contributions to Mathematics, 68, 13-58.

7. Fowler, A. G., Mariantoni, M., Martinis, J. M., & Cleland, A. N. (2012). "Surface codes: Towards practical large-scale quantum computation." Physical Review A, 86(3), 032324.

8. Terhal, B. M. (2015). "Quantum error correction for quantum memories." Reviews of Modern Physics, 87(2), 307.

9. Lidar, D. A., & Brun, T. A. (Eds.). (2013). Quantum Error Correction. Cambridge University Press.


3. Machine Learning for Quantum Error Correction

10. Torlai, G., & Melko, R. G. (2017). "Neural decoder for topological codes." Physical Review Letters, 119(3), 030501. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.030501

11. Varsamopoulos, S., Criger, B., & Bertels, K. (2018). "Decoding surface codes with deep learning." Quantum Science and Technology, 3(3), 035004.

12. Chamberland, C., & Ronagh, P. (2018). "Deep neural decoders for near term fault-tolerant experiments." Quantum Science and Technology, 3(4), 044002.

13. Nautrup, H. P., et al. (2019). "Optimizing quantum error correction codes with reinforcement learning." Quantum, 3, 215. https://doi.org/10.22331/q-2019-12-16-215

14. Baireuther, P., et al. (2018). "Machine-learning-assisted correction of correlated qubit errors in a topological code." Quantum, 2, 48.

15. Sweke, R., et al. (2020). "Reinforcement learning for quantum error correction." arXiv:2003.05252.

16. Fitzek, D., et al. (2020). "Deep Q-learning decoder for depolarizing noise." Machine Learning: Science and Technology, 1(3), 035004.

17. Maskara, N., et al. (2019). "Advantages of versatile neural-network decoding for topological codes." Physical Review A, 99(5), 052351.

18. Andreasson, P., Johansson, J., Liljestrand, S., & Granath, M. (2019). "Quantum error correction for the toric code using deep reinforcement learning." Quantum, 3, 183.


4. Quantum Control

19. Khaneja, N., Reiss, T., Kehlet, C., Schulte-Herbrüggen, T., & Glaser, S. J. (2005). "Optimal control of coupled spin dynamics: Design of NMR pulse sequences by gradient ascent algorithms." Journal of Magnetic Resonance, 172(2), 296-305.

20. Wilhelm, F. K., et al. (2020). "An introduction to optimal control for quantum systems." arXiv:2003.10132.

21. Devoret, M. H., & Schoelkopf, R. J. (2013). "Superconducting circuits for quantum information: An outlook." Science, 339(6124), 1169-1174.

22. Blais, A., Grimsmo, A. L., Girvin, S. M., & Wallraff, A. (2021). "Circuit quantum electrodynamics." Reviews of Modern Physics, 93(2), 025005.


5. Machine Learning for Quantum Control

23. Niu, M. Y., et al. (2019). "Universal quantum control through deep reinforcement learning." npj Quantum Information, 5(1), 33. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41534-019-0141-3

24. Baum, Y., et al. (2021). "Experimental deep reinforcement learning for error-robust gate-set design on a superconducting quantum computer." PRX Quantum, 2(4), 040324.

25. Wittler, N., et al. (2021). "Integrated tool set for control, calibration, and characterization of quantum devices applied to superconducting qubits." Physical Review Applied, 15(3), 034080.

26. Kelly, J., et al. (2018). "Physical qubit calibration on a directed acyclic graph." arXiv:1803.03226.

27. Klimov, P. V., et al. (2020). "Fluctuations of energy-relaxation times in superconducting qubits." Physical Review Letters, 121(9), 090502.

28. Werninghaus, M., et al. (2021). "Leakage reduction in fast superconducting qubit gates via optimal control." npj Quantum Information, 7(1), 14.

29. Rol, M. A., et al. (2019). "Fast, high-fidelity conditional-phase gate exploiting leakage interference in weakly anharmonic superconducting qubits." Physical Review Letters, 123(12), 120502.

30. Schäfer, F., et al. (2020). "A differentiable programming method for quantum control." Machine Learning: Science and Technology, 1(3), 035009.


6. Circuit Optimization

31. Khatri, S., et al. (2019). "Quantum-assisted quantum compiling." Quantum, 3, 140. https://doi.org/10.22331/q-2019-05-13-140

32. Li, G., et al. (2019). "Tackling the qubit mapping problem for NISQ-era quantum devices." ASPLOS, 1001-1014.

33. Zhu, E. Y., et al. (2020). "An adaptive optimizer for measurement-frugal variational algorithms." Quantum, 4, 263.

34. Cincio, L., et al. (2018). "Learning the quantum algorithm for state overlap." New Journal of Physics, 20(11), 113022.

35. Fösel, T., et al. (2021). "Quantum circuit optimization with deep reinforcement learning." arXiv:2103.07585.

36. Murali, P., et al. (2019). "Noise-adaptive compiler mappings for noisy intermediate-scale quantum computers." ASPLOS, 1015-1029.

37. Venturelli, D., et al. (2018). "Compiling quantum circuits to realistic hardware architectures using temporal planners." Quantum Science and Technology, 3(2), 025004.

38. Nash, B., et al. (2020). "Quantum circuit optimizations for NISQ architectures." Quantum Science and Technology, 5(2), 025010.

39. Itoko, T., Raymond, R., Imamichi, T., & Matsuo, A. (2020). "Optimization of quantum circuit mapping using gate transformation and commutation." Integration, 70, 43-50.


7. Materials Discovery

40. Schmidt, J., et al. (2019). "Recent advances and applications of machine learning in solid-state materials science." npj Computational Materials, 5(1), 83. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41524-019-0221-0

41. Butler, K. T., et al. (2018). "Machine learning for molecular and materials science." Nature, 559(7715), 547-555. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-018-0337-2

42. Choudhary, K., et al. (2022). "Recent advances and applications of deep learning methods in materials science." npj Computational Materials, 8(1), 59.

43. Sanchez-Lengeling, B., & Aspuru-Guzik, A. (2018). "Inverse molecular design using machine learning: Generative models for matter engineering." Science, 361(6400), 360-365.

44. Noh, J., et al. (2019). "Inverse design of solid-state materials via a continuous representation." Matter, 1(5), 1370-1384.

45. Kim, K., et al. (2021). "Machine learning-assisted design of superconducting circuits." Physical Review Applied, 16(1), 014032.

46. Ren, Z., et al. (2018). "Accelerated discovery of metallic glasses through iteration of machine learning and high-throughput experiments." Science Advances, 4(4), eaaq1566.


8. Quantum Machine Learning

47. Biamonte, J., et al. (2017). "Quantum machine learning." Nature, 549(7671), 195-202. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature23474

48. Cerezo, M., et al. (2021). "Variational quantum algorithms." Nature Reviews Physics, 3(9), 625-644.

49. Huang, H. Y., et al. (2022). "Quantum advantage in learning from experiments." Science, 376(6598), 1182-1186.

50. Liu, Y., et al. (2021). "Rigorous and robust quantum speedup in supervised machine learning." Nature Physics, 17(9), 1013-1017.

51. Abbas, A., et al. (2021). "The power of quantum neural networks." Nature Computational Science, 1(6), 403-409.

52. Schuld, M., & Petruccione, F. (2021). Machine Learning with Quantum Computers (2nd ed.). Springer.


9. Quantum Memory and QRAM

53. Giovannetti, V., Lloyd, S., & Maccone, L. (2008). "Quantum random access memory." Physical Review Letters, 100(16), 160501.

54. Arunachalam, S., Gheorghiu, V., Jochym-O'Connor, T., Mosca, M., & Srinivasan, V. (2015). "On the robustness of bucket brigade quantum RAM." New Journal of Physics, 17(12), 123010.

55. Hann, C. T., et al. (2021). "Resilience of quantum random access memory to generic noise." PRX Quantum, 2(2), 020311.


10. Variational Algorithms

56. McClean, J. R., et al. (2016). "The theory of variational hybrid quantum-classical algorithms." New Journal of Physics, 18(2), 023023.

57. Peruzzo, A., et al. (2014). "A variational eigenvalue solver on a photonic quantum processor." Nature Communications, 5(1), 4213.

58. Farhi, E., Goldstone, J., & Gutmann, S. (2014). "A quantum approximate optimization algorithm." arXiv:1411.4028.

59. McClean, J. R., et al. (2018). "Barren plateaus in quantum neural network training landscapes." Nature Communications, 9(1), 4812.


11. Hardware Platforms

Superconducting

60. Koch, J., et al. (2007). "Charge-insensitive qubit design derived from the Cooper pair box." Physical Review A, 76(4), 042319.

61. Krantz, P., et al. (2019). "A quantum engineer's guide to superconducting qubits." Applied Physics Reviews, 6(2), 021318.

Trapped Ion

62. Bruzewicz, C. D., Chiaverini, J., McConnell, R., & Sage, J. M. (2019). "Trapped-ion quantum computing: Progress and challenges." Applied Physics Reviews, 6(2), 021314.

63. Monroe, C., et al. (2021). "Programmable quantum simulations of spin systems with trapped ions." Reviews of Modern Physics, 93(2), 025001.

Photonic

64. O'Brien, J. L., Furusawa, A., & Vučković, J. (2009). "Photonic quantum technologies." Nature Photonics, 3(12), 687-695.

65. Madsen, L. S., et al. (2022). "Quantum computational advantage with a programmable photonic processor." Nature, 606(7912), 75-81.

Neutral Atom

66. Saffman, M. (2016). "Quantum computing with atomic qubits and Rydberg interactions: progress and challenges." Journal of Physics B, 49(20), 202001.

67. Henriet, L., et al. (2020). "Quantum computing with neutral atoms." Quantum, 4, 327.


12. Surveys and Reviews

68. Bharti, K., et al. (2022). "Noisy intermediate-scale quantum algorithms." Reviews of Modern Physics, 94(1), 015004.

69. Endo, S., Cai, Z., Benjamin, S. C., & Yuan, X. (2021). "Hybrid quantum-classical algorithms and quantum error mitigation." Journal of the Physical Society of Japan, 90(3), 032001.

70. Alexeev, Y., et al. (2021). "Quantum computer systems for scientific discovery." PRX Quantum, 2(1), 017001.


Citation Format

All references follow APA 7th edition format. DOI links are provided where available.


How to Cite This Series

If you use concepts from this research series, please cite:

@misc{ai_quantum_symbiosis_2026,
  author = {[Your Name]},
  title = {AI-Quantum Symbiosis: How AI Accelerates Quantum Computing},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {Research Series},
  note = {Available at: Documents/Learning/ai\_quantum\_symbiosis/}
}

References compiled for: AI-Quantum Symbiosis Research Series
Location: Documents/Learning/ai_quantum_symbiosis/

Continue exploring